Roth & Company, PC Tax Update Blog

Tax Update Blog: Permalink

« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »

What's the opposite of tax reform?

February 06, 2012

Martin Sullivan at Tax Analysts loses hope that the Obama administration will attempt tax reform:

It wouldn't be so bad if Obama simply remained a lackadaisical supporter of tax reform. But his proposals are actually moving us in the opposite direction. As the election approaches, he and his advisers are feeling the need to dish out new tax breaks. So the president who on national television shouted at Congress to "get rid of the loopholes" now wants to add a bunch of new loopholes of his own.

Instead of cleaning up code and lowering rates, we see a batch of focus-group inspired tax breaks:

Just as with Clinton's parade of tax breaks, the growing list of Obama's special benefits includes features that are absurdly complex. The president wants to double the tax deduction currently available to manufacturing in the case of "advanced manufacturing technologies." It has been difficult enough to figure out how to differentiate manufacturing from other businesses under section 199. What in the world is "advanced manufacturing technology"? Are we talking about technologically advanced production processes or about technologically advanced products? If a product or production line includes advanced technology, is the entire product or production line eligible for the benefit, or just the components with the advanced technology features?

The questions are endless. There will certainly be major disputes between the IRS and taxpayers. We can add a nice, new chapter to the book on everything we hate about tax law.

Unfortunately the tendency to make the tax law more difficult to enact pretty-sounding tax breaks isn't confined to Washington. While the President and the Governor of Iowa are from different parties, they both are proposing to jerry-rig new narrow breaks to an already byzantine tax law. In Iowa, ESOPs are the flavor of the month. And, of course, special tax breaks do more harm than good. From Mr. Sullivan:

Only in exceptional circumstances do violations of tax neutrality promote growth. Just because these tax breaks are well intentioned and targeted to sympathetic causes does not make them exceptional.

Iowa, with the nation's highest corporate rate and one of its most complicated tax laws, would do much better with simplicity and lower rates -- with the Quick and Dirty Iowa Tax Reform, for example.

Link to Tax Analysts content courtesy of their special arrangement with the TaxProf. Tax Notes subscribers can follow this link.

UPDATE, 2/8: Free link to Sullivan story at Tax.com.

Tags: ......

      Bookmark: del.icio.usDiggreddit

Comments

Cannot agree more. Why can't we get Washington to stop this nonsense. Tackle the problem, do not add additional problems. Such an unworkable concept to add to other unworkable code concepts. The reality is that corporate rates are low and provide enough incentives. The problem here is that neither side is knows enough about the issues and even when they do they are making decisions for special interests groups and not for the overall good of our country. Until that changes we are all stuck with an incomprehensible, unworkable and unfair tax code.

Maybe we have Congressman and the President serve for only one term; that is it. No big perks for them. No special interest groups. Then if someone serves the only incentive is true service to the country and a genuine interest to just make our country better. Probably never happen, but what a concept.

Post a comment





Email: jkristan@rothcpa.com  •  Phone: (515) 244-0266
All content © Roth & Company, P.C.  •  Powered by Movable Type  •  Site by Sekimori Design