« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
Supporters of increasing the rates at the top two brackets like to say that it will only affect 3%, or 2%, of "small" businesses. An opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal explains why that is an absurd talking point:
The 3% figure, which is computed from IRS data, is based on simply counting the number of returns with any pass-through business income. So, if somebody makes a little money selling products on eBay and reports that income on Schedule C of their tax return, they are counted as a small business. The fact that there are millions of people in the lower tax brackets with small amounts of business income may be interesting for some purposes, but it is irrelevant for the assessment of the economic impact of the tax hikes.The numbers are clear. According to IRS data, fully 48% of the net income of sole proprietorships, partnerships, and S corporations reported on tax returns went to households with incomes above $200,000 in 2007. That's the number to look at, not the 3%.
That's a point I've been making.
Related: DEPARTMENT OF MEANINGLESS STATISTICS
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rothcpa.com/mt/contages.cgi/2148
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference WSJ: The 97% Fallacy:
» 3% or 48%? from Taxable Talk
What will the impact be of the elimination of the Bush Tax Cuts? Proponents of eliminating the cuts note that only 3% of small business owners will be impacted. Well, that’s true…but it’s anything but the whole story. As Joe Kristan h... [Read More]
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to