« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
The strange relief provision for some S corporation built-in gains made it into the conference version of the stimulus monstrosity.
The S corporation built-in gains tax (IRC Sec. 1374) applies a 35% tax when an S corporation takes "built-in gains" into income. "Built-in gains" are items for which a former C corporation had accrued economic benefit on the day its S corporation took effect, but which had not been recognized for tax purposes. For example, if the corporation had a piece of land worth $100,000 on the day it became an S corporation, and the land had a basis of $80,000, there would be a "built-in gain" of $20,000.
The Sec. 1374 tax normally only applies to a corporation's built-in gains taken into income during its first 10-years as an S corporation. The bill (bill Sec. 1251) temporarily reduces this ten-year "built-in gains period" to seven years for built-in gains recognized in 2009 and 2010. For 2009, that benefits corporations that made S elections effective in 2000-2002; in 2010, it would help S elections made in 2001-2003.
Why? Apparently S corporations that made their elections effective from 2000-2003 hold the key to economic recovery.
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
Comments
according to above, a corporation that made S election in 2002 would not be subject to built-in gains tax if property sold in 2009. What if S election was made March 1, 2002 (fiscal year end changed to calender year end upon S election)? 7 whole years would not have been completed by beginning of 2009. Would S corp. not be subject to built-in gain?
Posted by: mike | October 4, 2010 3:31 PM
Mike: Under current law, not in 2009. See my 10/5/2010 post for more details.
Posted by: Joe Kristan | October 5, 2010 9:17 AM