« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
One little-noticed provision in the new H.R. 4, the new pension bill awaiting the President's signature, cracks down on the donation of used household goods to charity. The Joint Committee on Taxation's report on the bill shows this isn't a small issue:
As recently reported by the IRS, the amount claimed as deductions in tax year 2003 for clothing and household items was more than $9 billion.
I have always thought that Goodwill and the Salvation Army would be economic behemoths if the clothing donations they received wore really worth the amount clamed as deductions for them. $9 billion is about the annual revenue of CSX, the railroad holding company, for example.
To crack down, the new tax law will forbid deductions for household items not in "good" condition. Also, the IRS will be:
...authorized to deny by regulation a deduction for any contribution of clothing or a household item that has minimal monetary value, such as used socks and used undergarments.
At least now if former President Clinton gets audited for his $2 per-pair deduction of used underwear, it won't matter whether it's boxers or briefs. Under the new law, though, he can still get a deduction for them if they appraise out at over $500. The Red Cross may be able to use the fabric.

• 2006 Pension bill Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
Comments
Come on. Fat jokes???
Posted by: Stefanie | August 9, 2006 10:16 AM
Childish underwear humor, mostly. I'm trying to broaden my appeal.
Posted by: Joe Kristan | August 9, 2006 10:29 AM
No word on whether little blue dresses with slight discolorations are deductible? Is that good condition? What if the discoloration actually raises the value?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Posted by: Chad | August 9, 2006 11:35 AM