« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
This came in today's mail:
The Licensing Division Newsletter publishes summaries of disciplinary actions. Maybe we'll see things like this come through:
Case 08-02 Giles S. Finlayson Mechanicsville, IowaThis matter concerns charges filed against respondent Giles S. Finlayson . The Interior Design Examining Board held a contested case hearing on May 23, 2008.
The board charged Respondent with acts discreditable to the practice of interior design as follows:
Count 1. Garish placement of an art-deco table, clearly suitable only for a room with moderne sensibilities, in a room with dark wood paneling and a painting of Elvis.
In the hearing respondent said that the art-deco table was "fabulous" in its context and that the Board "has no sense of the ironic." The board finds Respondent in violation of Count 1.
2. Reckless and negligent use of '70s motifs.
Respondent said that he was inspired by a book "Interior Decorations" by one James Lileks in decorating the house at issue. The board explained that the book is really titled "Interior Desecrations" and is in fact a mockery of '70s design. After discussion, the board ruled the results "fabulous" and cleared respondent of the charges.
SANCTION.
The legislature has granted the board a wide array of disciplinary sanctions. The board may revoke, suspend, or refuse to renew a license, or any combination.
The board considers its role to be educational as well as disciplinary. We order Respondent to take 8 hours of continuing education, as approved in advance by the board, and to consent to having any use of art-deco items cleared in advance by an outside designer as designated by the board.
Unfortunately, it's too late for the board to deal with some design crimes:

Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
Comments
OMG, that's TOO good!
And the nod to Lileks: priceless!
Thanx for sharing this one!
Posted by: hgstern | March 30, 2006 10:48 AM
Thanks!
I was hoping somebody would get the Lileks reference.
Posted by: Joe Kristan | March 31, 2006 6:48 AM