« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
The Supreme Court today ruled that contingent fees in successful lawsuits are taxable income to the recipients, and must be deducted as miscellaneous itemized deductions. As miscellaneous deductions are not deductible for computing alternative minimum tax, this usually means they aren't really deductible at all.
The Court rejected the argument that the contingent fees shouldn't be treated as income to the plaintiff in the first place.
In effect the Court is again telling Congress: you broke it, you fix it. Congress last year changed this rule for plaintiffs who prevail in civil rights cases, but the Supreme Court's ruling will still apply to other cases unless Congress acts.
The Tax Prof is on top of this one.
Prior Tax Update Coverage: SUPREMES TO HEAR CASE ON TAXATION OF CONTINGENT ATTORNEY FEES IN INCOME
UPDATE: Prof. Maule weighs in with a kind of wisdom that has so far eluded our tax writers:
The Congress needs a better way of dealing with tax issues, and I, for one, will not accept "but it's complicated" as an excuse for its failure to prevent the sort of mess that taxpayers found themselves in, when it is the Congress itself that created the mess. The fact that Congress chose to help only some taxpayers and not all highlights the dangers of a Congress that legislates by caving to lobbyists rather than acting with wisdom and even-handed judgment. And leaving the clean-up to the courts is just plain irresponsible.
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to