The Volokh Conspiracy catches The New York Times in an inanity:
A story in today's New York Times about the federal Superfund program observes: "Since 1995, when Congress did not renew a special tax on polluters, the cleanup money has come entirely from taxpayers." Huh? The money in Superfund always came from "taxpayers" -- that is, it has always come from those paying taxes.
The Volokh post goes on to say that the Superfund Tax was a tax on "chemical feedstocks," with no connection with the pollution output of the taxpayers. There was an excise tax like that (IRC Sec. 4661), but there was also a "Superfund Tax" even less connected to pollution.
Internal Revenue Code Section 59A, which expired at the end of 1995, imposed a .12% "environmental tax" on corporate Alternative Minimum Taxable Income. This tax was imposed on any corporation with AMTI over $2,000,000. Banks, insurance companies and (horrors!) accounting firms were subject to the same "superfund tax" as lead refiners and cyanide makers.
The Times must hate technical nit-pickers like us. Of course, we delude ourselves to think they will even notice.
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to