« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
The IRS today published Rev. Rul. 2004-55 on how proceeds of employer-paid disability insurance are taxed. The ruling's conclusions are what you might expect:
-If the employee receives the insurance benefit tax-free, the benefits are taxable, but
-If the employee has elected to be taxed on the employer's premium payments, the proceeds are tax free.
The ruling covers long-term and short-term plans.
Key text:
HOLDING Under the Amended Plan, long-term disability benefits received by an employee who has irrevocably elected, prior to the beginning of the plan year, to have the coverage paid by the Employer on an after-tax basis for the plan year in which the employee becomes disabled are attributable solely to after-tax employee contributions and are excludable from the employee's gross income under Sec. 104(a)(3).
Under the Amended Plan, long-term disability benefits received by an employee whose coverage is paid by the Employer on a pre-tax basis for the plan year in which the employee becomes disabled are attributable solely to pre-tax Employer contributions and are includible in the employee's gross income under Sec. 105(a).
UPDATE: Reader "Chad" makes an important point in the comment below.
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
Comments
I think the important part of the ruling is not the quoted holding as that has been the general rule for a long time and generalizes the holding of PLR 200146010. The important part is that a plan to which some employees contribute and others do not can be contributory for some and non-contributory for others, respectively. This is contrary to the traditional ERISA understanding which is if one employee contributes one dollar the whole plan is contributory. Something which few ERISA attorneys would actually catch on to.
Posted by: Chad | June 9, 2004 4:44 PM
Chad, that would explain why they issued a Revenue Ruling for a seemingly unsurprising conclusion. Thanks for the comment
Posted by: Joe Kristan | June 10, 2004 7:34 AM