« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
Frank Chen got caught up in the day-trading frenzy of the late 1990s. After making 12 trades in January 1999, he geared up to 133 trades in February and 145 in March. Sometime in April he apparently began to reconsider this financial strategy, as he only made 25 trades that month. The $84,794 in trading losses he was to report on his 1999 return may have had something to do with this decision. In May he was down to four trades, and he made no trades at all in June.
When he filed his return, he claimed that he was a stock "trader." Stock traders can fully deduct their capital losses as ordinary losses; lesser mortals, being mere investors, can only deduct capital losses to the extent of their capital gains, plus $3,000. Unused losses carry forward indefinitely.
WHAT MAKES A TRADER?
The Tax Court, in considering Mr. Chen's 1999 tax return, said that there are two hurdles to cross to become a trader:
1. You must buy and sell frequently enough to try "to catch the swings in the daily market movements." The court said Mr. Chen met this test in February and March, 1999.
2. The trading activity must be "regular, frequent and continuous." The court said Mr. Chen failed to clear this hurdle:
In the cases in which taxpayers have been held to be traders in securities, the number and frequency of transactions indicated that they were engaged in market transactions almost daily for a substantial and continuous period, generally exceeding a single taxable year; and those activities constituted the taxpayers’ sole or primary income-producing activity. Conversely, where, as in this case, (1) the taxpayer’s daily trading activities covered only a portion of a single taxable year, and (2) securities trading was not the sole or even primary activity in which the taxpayer engaged for the production of income, trader status was denied. Daily trading in securities for only a quarter of a single taxable year is reasonably characterized as “sporadic” rather than “frequent, regular, and continuous”, and, therefore, insufficient to achieve trader status.
(citations omitted.)
Mr. Chen would have had to continue his trading into 2000 to get to the tax treatment he desired. Considering that he lost $84,000 in less than 3 months of heavy trading, that might have been an expensive tax accomplishment.
Trader status is, perversely, only a tax advantage if you are unsuccessful. Traders with gains don't qualify for reduced capital gain rates.
Still, Mr. Chen can work through his losses at the rate of $3,000 per year on future returns. Assuming no more capital gains, he will use the last of them on his 2027 tax return.
Link: Frank Chen v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-132 (pdf file).
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
Comments
What I'd like to know is how he got to a deficiency of $611,357 and additions to tax totaling $252,093. I guess MediaQ paid handsome stock options. Not bad for a programmer making $74,699.
Posted by: A | June 3, 2004 2:56 PM
I was kind of wondering that myself. He didn't seem to fight those additions very hard. He must have been a busy guy, what with day trading, a full-time chip engineering job, and whatever he did to earn $600,000+ on the side.
Posted by: Joe Kristan | June 4, 2004 7:19 AM