Tax Update Blog: February 2007 Archives
« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
LET IT SNOW: MARCH 1 FARM FILERS GET ICE STORM EXTENSION
February 28, 2007
Farmers who are slip-sliding to their mailbox to mail their returns by March 1 can skate back inside. The IRS today announced that it is waiving the March 1 deadline for farmers and fishermen affected by the recent ice storms. From the announcement:
Generally, farmers and fisherman can avoid an estimated tax penalty if they file their returns and pay the full amount of tax shown on their return by March 1, 2006. An individual is a farmer or fisherman for these purposes if two-thirds of the individual’s total gross income for the taxable year or the preceding taxable year is from farming or fishing (including oyster farming).
If a taxpayer has an underpayment of estimated tax, all or part of the penalty for the underpayment may be waived if the IRS determines that the underpayment was due to a casualty, disaster or other unusual circumstance and it would be inequitable to impose the penalty.
To request a waiver of the estimated tax penalty, complete Form 2210-F Underpayment of Estimated Tax by Farmers and Fisherman. As indicated in the instructions, attach a statement explaining the reasons you are unable to meet the estimated tax requirements. At the top of your request write “Request for Waiver Due to Winter Ice Storms”.
UPDATE: Iowa has extended its deadline for March 1 farm filers to March 15.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
BERTHA DON'T YOU COME AROUND HERE ANYMORE, SAYS IRS
February 28, 2007
While the name "Bertha's Tax Service" sounds synonymous with "quality," the IRS doesn't see it that way. They want to shut Bertha down.
The IRS says Bertha's Tax Service as been less than punctilious in its tax preparation business. From the IRS complaint:
13. [Bertha] Steverson solicits basic information from her customers, which includes only amounts paid to them for wages and their number of dependents. Steverson reviews the customer’s information and tells them that she can increase their refund amount by including additional deductions (other income tax preparers would not claim.)
14. Steverson asks the customers to leave only their Forms W-2 with her, and she explains that she can “massage” their tax returns, to increase the amount of the customer’s tax refund. In most cases, Steverson’s customers were not provided an opportunity to review the income tax return before it was filed. Most customers reviewed
their income tax returns for the first time during an IRS audit. During the audits, the customers acknowledged the deductions claimed on their returns were false, and not based on information they provided to Steverson.
In Chicago nowadays, it appears "massage" is now a synonym for "mangle" or "abuse." I'll have to remember that if I'm ever there and have a backache.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
AMT - ISO VICTIMS RUNNING OUT OF VENUES
February 28, 2007
Many taxpayers holding incentive stock options (ISOs) at the time of the tech-bust of 2000 ended up with a big alternative minimum tax liability on worthless stock options. They have been in court ever since trying to get a better deal. The Tax Court and circuit courts have turned down their arguments. Now they've also lost in the Court of Federal Claims, a venue not often used to fight tax cases.
The AMT plaintiff this time was Lauren Guzak, who had over $1.5 million in AMT income from ISOs. When the stock dropped the value of her ISOs by $600,000, she tried to claim it as all currently deductible. Like every other court, the Court of Claims held that the loss was a capital loss, and AMT capital losses are subject to the same $3,000 annual limit as regular losses.
Looking on the bright side, Ms. Guzak can look forward to a $3,000 annual AMT capital loss for the next 200 years. She can also use recently enacted legislation to get refunds of part of her ISO AMT liability. (UPDATE: the new law may not do her any good. See the comments).
Cite: Guzak, Court of Claims No. 05-1070T
Related: YET ANOTHER AMT-ISO VICTIM LOSES IN TAX COURT
Link • Comments (2) Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
THE IRS WANTS TO HEAR ABOUT THAT ACCOUNT IN THE CAYMANS
February 28, 2007
The IRS issued a Fact Sheet yesterday covering the requirements for reporting foreighn financial accounts:
Who is required to report their foreign accounts to the government, and how do they do so? The Bank Secrecy Act requires U.S. persons who own a foreign bank account, brokerage account, mutual fund, unit trust, or other financial account to file a Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Authority (FBAR), if:
1. The person has financial interest in, signature authority, or other authority over one or more accounts in a foreign country, and
2. The aggregate value of all foreign financial accounts exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year.
These forms are due by June 30. Failure to file can lead to unpleasant consequences:
For an FBAR violation occurring after Oct. 22, 2004, the maximum civil penalty for a willful violation of the FBAR reporting and recordkeeping requirements is the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the balance in the account at the time of the violation. Non-willful violations can result in a penalty as high as $10,000 for each violation. Criminal violations of the FBAR rules can result in a fine and/or five years in prison.
Link • Comments (4) Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
I'LL BE RIGHT BACK, SURE
February 28, 2007
I hear the weather on the Mediterranean is delightful this time of year. One might even be tempted to linger:
ROCKFORD — A Rockford psychiatrist accused of underreporting his income by several million dollars on tax documents will be allowed travel to Lebanon while the case against him proceeds.
The United States Justice Department has accused Imad Al-Basha of underreporting his income and the income of the dermatology business
his wife owns by more than $3 million since the year 2000.
Al-Basha appeared in court on Tuesday with his attorney Jim Zuba and pleaded not guilty to the charges.
This isn't typical. Most people have to surrender their passports if they are indicted. The U.S. Attorney objected here, but the Magistrate Judge Michael Mahoney decided the travel would be fine under strict conditions:
Mahoney decided that Al-Basha would be able to travel to Lebanon for one week every four weeks as long as he made sure the court knew how to reach him in that country.
The judge shows a lot more faith in human nature than I would.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
IT'S A LONG WAY FROM HERE TO TED'S CONEY ISLAND
February 27, 2007
Welcome to the newest addition to the Kaleidescope Food Court:
You'll notice that the Sushi Box is as far away as possible from the Food Court's Maid-Rite shop.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
STATE ECONOMIC INCENTIVES: A LOSERS GAME?
February 27, 2007
Two maps say something about state tax incentives for economic development: they're for losers.
First: a map of state investment tax credit policies:
(Source: Chirinko and Wilson, State Tax Investment Incentives: A Few Facts. Tax Notes, 2/26/2007 ($link))
Next: a map of state economic growth:
(Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis)
While state investment tax credit policies aren't a perfect indicator of state economic development tax credits, they'll work as a rough indicator. You'll see that the incentives tend to cluster among the states with the weakest economic growth. Only one strong growth state (dark blue in the second map) - mighty Idaho - has an investment tax credit. Lots of the weak growth (yellow) states do.
The moral? You can't grow the economy of your whole state by taxing your existing businesses to lure and subsidize their competitors. Maybe you should try instead to make your state a good place for everyone to do business - not just those with the lobbyists and tax consultants to bag investment credits.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS DON'T REGISTER WITH REGISTER
February 26, 2007
The Des Moines Register had a piece this weekend about strategies used by small business to control health care costs. They made room for Jack Hatch to plug his "universal" health plan, but there isn't a peep about high-deductible insurance, HSAs, or any other aspect of consumer-driven health care. Needless to say, there's no mention of the new Bush administration health care proposals.
The Register seems to be unware that there could be any path to health care reform other than more government.
Related:
CENTER-LEFT THINK TANK LOOKS AT BUSH HEALTH PROPOSALS
IN THIS CORNER, THE VILLANOVA MAULER
DR. MAULE AND THE BUSH HEALTH CARE PLAN
STATE OF THE UNION HEALTH CARE PROPOSAL
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
IOWA LAW BLOGGER TALKS ABOUT S CORPORATION EMPLOYMENT TAXES
February 26, 2007
Des Moines lawyer Rush Nigut talks about the employment tax savings potential of S corporations at Rush on Business.
These savings are the ones associated with the "John Edwards Tax Shelter." You can read more here. It's an issue the IRS is hitting hard on audits right now, so it's a tool to be used carefully.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
NORMAL WINTER DRIVING CONDITIONS
February 24, 2007
The view from the Interstate 235 "trip camera" at 22nd street in West Des Moines this morning. No, it's not a focus problem; that's what it looks like through the coating of ice on the camera.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
TOWER EXECUTIVE RESOURCES CLIENT GETS TWO YEARS
February 23, 2007
A California dentist today received a two-year sentence for participating in a Tower Executive Resources offshore tax scam. From the Department of Justice press release:
According to the indictment and evidence introduced at trial, in approximately 1995, Lewis became a client of Tower Executive Resources, a Denver organization that promoted a tax evasion scheme involving the use of false invoices and secret offshore bank accounts. Lewis’ medical practice paid bogus expenses to Tower to generate false tax deductions. Tower then deposited the bulk of the funds into a secret offshore bank account that Lewis controlled.
Over a 10-year period, Lewis sent approximately $300,000 to a secret offshore bank account through the Tower system. In addition, when the IRS learned of the Tower scheme and audited Lewis’s tax liabilities, he stopped filing income tax returns and falsely claimed that he believed the law did not require him to file returns.
Maybe he doesn't believe the law says that, but the judge, the federal marshals and the Bureau of Prisons feel otherwise.
Scam organizers Lester Retherford and Paul D. Harris are already serving federal sentences.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
THE ART OF SPECIAL INTEREST LEGISLATING
February 23, 2007
A tremendous new "economic growth" bill was introduced this week in the Iowa legislature. HF 456 would do three big things:
1. It would broaden the definition of "cultural and entertainment district."
2. It would allow artists to deduct the appreciated value of their own work when it is donated to charity; and
3. It would allow artists living and working in cultural and entertainment districts to skip Iowa income tax on the first $25,000 of income from the sale of "a unique work of art."
This could have two tremendous effects on my practice. First, the deduction for appreciated self-created work of arts would finally enable me to realize my long held dream: opening the Digital Museum of Deductible Art.
Second, I consider everything I do to be a unique work of art, in its own way. I do almost all my work on a computer connected to the Internet, which is certainly worthy of designation as a cultural and entertainment district. That $25,000 tax exemption is as good as mine!
Tacks Shelter, Vol 2. Artist: J. Kristan. Estimated Fair Market Value: $25,000.
Link • Eye on the Legislature: 2007 Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
MOMMY'S GOING AWAY, BUT THE TAX COURT SAYS IT'S TEMPORARY FOR NOW
February 23, 2007
Cynthia Rowe was struggling as a single mom in 2002. She supported her two children in Eugene, Oregon with wages, unemployment benefits, welfare and food stamps. She then took a bold step in early June 2002 to secure long-term accomodations, shooting her brother-in-law in the head.
One thing led to another, and Ms. Rowe ended up with a life sentence for first-degree murder. Even so, she was attentive to her income tax obligations, filing a timely 2002 tax return claiming a refund under the earned income credit. She got her refund, but the IRS then wanted it back. The IRS said that her June incarceration meant she failed to "share the same principal place of abode" with her children for half of 2002 - one of the requirements to receive the credit.
The Tax Court decided, in effect, that she was innocent until proven guilty:
We find that an individual confined in jail after an arrest but before conviction is necessarily, but nonpermanently, absent from his or her home. Such an individual generally intends to return home, just as an individual in military service or afflicted by illness intends to return home once he or she is able. Thus, the necessary, nonpermanent absence of jail confinement is similar to those examples listed in the head of household regulations.
The moral? However dire the circumstances, it's always worthwhile to file your return on time.
Cite: Rowe, 128 T.C. No. 3.
UPDATE: The Tax Prof has more.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
OREGON ALSO HAS NICOTINE-CRAZED LEGISLATORS
February 23, 2007
A policy debate in Oregon has an eerie resemblance to the the Iowa Legislature's impending $1 hike in cigarette taxes. Like the Iowa scheme, the Oregon hike will be linked to new health insurance programs.
The Tax Policy Blog finds this unwise:
There really is no justification for raising the cigarette tax to pay for this children's health care program. If the program is worthwhile on its own, it should be funded by general revenue. Taxing cigarettes and funding a children's health insurance program are totally separate, and there is absolutely no legitimate reason for why one should fund the other beyond the fact that cigarette tax hikes are easier sells politically than raising taxes on everyone.
What's even stranger is the way that Iowa's tax hikers say the higher tax will reduce smoking. While it's nice that they admit that taxes affect behavior, it means that if the tax is successful in affecting behavior, the new programs will lose their funding as smokers quit. If you think they'll cut back the programs if the funding dries up, you're smoking something much stronger than Winstons.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, GEORGE
February 22, 2007
Today is George Washington's birthday. Few people anymore realize that he was the most important figure in America in five decades. It would be as though President Kennedy had just now retired from public life. He's called "the indispensable man" for a reason.
He left his mark on the tax law both through his efforts in writing a constitution with a strong central government and his determination to enforce the federal tax laws. The picture above shows him actually leading the troops as commander-in-chief of the armed forces to suppress the Whiskey Rebellion, a tax uprising in Pennsylvania.
Ed Brown, take note.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
DELIVERING THE GOODS; FRAUD ROUNDUP
February 22, 2007
Russ Fox's Taxable Talk has a roundup of some recent tax fraud cases, incuding the sad story of a man who became a day-trading celebrity during the late 1990s stock market frenzy.
He also has a very handy listing of actual street addresses for IRS service centers for taxpayers submitting filings to the IRS using private delivery services.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
BUSH HEALTH PROPOSAL FACT SHEET
February 22, 2007
The White House is continuing to push its plan to radiacally restructure the U.S. health insurance market. The effort includes a new fact sheet issued yesterday. It lays out the basics of the proposal:
The Current Tax Code Is Unfair To Americans Who Do Not Get Health Insurance Through Their Jobs. Unlike those who get insurance through their jobs, people who buy health insurance on their own have to pay for it with after-tax dollars and receive no assistance from the tax code. Americans who are self-employed pay no income taxes on their premiums, but because they still owe payroll taxes, they are also disadvantaged compared to those who get insurance through their employers.
* Under Current Law, The Tax Code Also Pushes People Toward Expensive Health Insurance And Lower Wages. The more expensive the health insurance plan people receive through their employers, the more tax relief they get. This makes the insurance market less competitive and pushes up prices for everyone by encouraging many workers to choose more expensive health insurance than they would choose if the tax code were not distorting their decision.
The President Has Proposed Replacing Our Current Health Insurance Tax System With A Standard Deduction For Health Insurance. Under the President's proposal, families with health insurance will pay no income or payroll taxes on $15,000 dollars of income. Single Americans with health insurance will pay no income or payroll taxes on $7,500 of income.
Prior Coverage:
CENTER-LEFT THINK TANK LOOKS AT BUSH HEALTH PROPOSALS
IN THIS CORNER, THE VILLANOVA MAULER
DR. MAULE AND THE BUSH HEALTH CARE PLAN
STATE OF THE UNION HEALTH CARE PROPOSAL
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
MORE PATENT ABSURDITY
February 22, 2007
The TaxProf has two posts on efforts of the American Bar Association Tax Section to cope with the proliferation of patents for tax strategies.
This post reports on a letter sent by the Tax Section's patent task force to the IRS urging them to require that all "patented" tax strategies be disclosed on tax returns as "reportable transactions."
That strikes me as a lame and doomed improvisation. All it would do would be to add an inconvenience to the use of patented tax strategies. One of the biggest dangers of these patents is the liklihood that patents are being issued on things people will do anyway; they will keep on doing what they have always done and find themselves inadvertently violating disclosure requirements resulting from some patent they've never heard of.
I'm convinced there's a much more direct and effective approach to the problem. Putting this language in the US Code should do the trick:
(a) No patent shall be granted for any method of compliance or planning with respect to Title 26 of the U.S. Code.(b) Any patent granted prior to the date of enactment of this Section with respect to a patent referred to in subsection (a) shall be null and void.
The TaxProf also posts on a teleconference scheduled today for lawyers on issues raised by tax patents.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
JUST MAIL ME THE TITLE DOCUMENTS
February 22, 2007
Ed Brown, the convicted tax evader holed up in his fortress house in New Hampshire, just gave me an office building, according to Concord Monitor Online:
Ed Brown also offered his wife's West Lebanon dental office as a reward to the first person who can show him a law making him and his wife liable for any federal income taxes. He values the building at $1 million.
As we already did that, we get a building, right? Well, maybe not:
If Brown gives away the building, he will be violating a restraining order.
Well, the building may not be a bargain anyway. The tenant base is worthless, as his wife won't be working the dental office anytime soon. She too is holed up in the house in violation of her post-conviction bail on tax evasion charges, pending the prison sentence that will begin after they end their own self-imposed house imprisonment.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
DIRTY, DIRTY DOZEN SCAMS
February 21, 2007
The IRS issued its updated "Dirty Dozen" list of tax scams yesterday. Five new scams made the elite list, led by the new problem of telephone excise tax refund abuse.
Don't Mess with Taxes has detailed coverage, and the TaxProf is also on the case.
The five scams that fell off the list this year were unavailable for comment, but were reported by their publicists to be recovering at home.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
TOURNAMENT POKER IS STILL A GAMBLE
February 21, 2007
The Tax Court ruled yesterday that poker tournaments are gambling under the tax law, rather than sporting events like a football game (after all, nobody gambles on football, right?).
Tax bloggers are flooding the zone on this one. Russ Fox is the go-to guy on gambling tax issues, and he has coverage here. The Tax Prof and Kreig Mitchell are also on the case.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
NO RECORDS, NO DEDUCTION
February 21, 2007
If you want to take a deduction, you have to be able to document it. If you want to take a business deduction, you need to have at least rudimentary business records to document the who, what, when, where and why of your business spending.
Armies of government employees have lived comfortably off the extra taxes paid by taxpayers who fail to maintain their business records. Another taxpayer was defeated by poor records in Tax Court yesterday.
Robert Damron was a postal worker in San Francisco in 2001. He also ran a little side business:
At trial, petitioner gave examples of the services he provided, such as assisting businesses collecting debts from customers, searching courthouse records or newspapers that might provide information that could lead to assets of delinquent customers, negotiating with debtors, etc.
His day in Tax Court went badly:
At trial, petitioner offered into evidence copies of various checks that were issued purportedly for payment of expenses related to the activity; however, no documentation was offered to tie in or corroborate that such payments were in connection with the business activity. Petitioner claims he had such information at home and did not realize that such information was crucial to his case.
The case should never have gotten to the point where Mr. Damron was trying to explain cancelled checks to a judge. If he had kept decent records, the original IRS agent who audited him would have probably gone away satisfied. While keeping good business records is wise for many reasons, it's essential for taking business deductions.
Cite: Damron, T.C. Summ. Op. 2007-24
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
TAX COURT REJECTS 'MURPHY'-TYPE ARGUMENT, IMPOSES PENALTIES
February 21, 2007
Murphy's law doesn't work in the Tax Court.
Marcia Green was a non-tenured Humanities instructor at San Francisco State University. She filed a discrimination complaint after she was turned down for a tenured position. The complaint wasn't upheld and the university stopped assigning her to teach courses. She sued and in 2002 won a $2.3 million judgement when the jury found the university retaliated against her because of her discrimination complaint.
Ms. Green filed a 2002 Form 1040 that omitted her lawsuit proceeds. The IRS disagreed with her position and assessed her a $909,000 tax deficiency and a $181,000 "accuracy-related" penalty. The accuracy related penalty applies when you understate your liability by 20% or more without reasonable cause.
Since 1996 the Internal Revenue Code has stated that personal injuries can be excluded from income only when they are for "physical" injuries. Before it withdrew its own decision, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals held in Murphy that the 1996 provision was unconstitutional.
The Tax Court ruled against Ms. Green yesterday. The Tax Court didn't discuss the Murphy case in its decision; in fact, it ignored Murphy's "return of human capital" argument entirely. The opinion simply stated that the damages are income under the long-standing Glenshaw Glass reasoning. The 1996 change in the law required damages to be "physical" to qualify for exclusion. They weren't, so they didn't, and the taxpayer lost.
By imposing the accuracy-related penalty, the court seems to say that the Murphy logic wasn't even enough to pass the laugh test. That may not be entirely accurate; its decision might simply be saying that she didn't rely on professional advice when she decided to not report the income. Even so, it doesn't look like the Tax Court is very impressed with the Murphy rationale.
Cite: Green, T.C. Memo 2007-39.
Link: Complete Tax Update Murphy coverage.
Link • Murphy decision Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
DES MOINES LAWYER PUBLISHES LAW REVIEW PIECE ON 'MURPHY' ISSUES
February 20, 2007
The TaxProf notes that John Fatino of the Whitfield and Eddy law firm has published "The Tax Treatment of Verdicts and Settlements Following the Adoption of the Jobs Creation Act of 2004: Paradise Found for the Employment Lawyer?" in the Northern Illinois University Law Review. It covers the issues that rose to prominence following the now-withdrawn Murphy decision on whistleblower damages.
Mr. Fatino seems to think that the original Murphy logic may hold up:
Shortly before this article went to press, a panel of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held § 104(a)(2) unconstitutional, in so far as it permits the taxation of an award of damages for mental distress and loss of reputation, because such items would not have been income to the framers of the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Practitioners should closely examine this opinion for additional grounds of attack on the taxation of physical and non-physical injuries. Moreover, there is an excellent discussion as to whether a payment on account of physical injury is compensation for loss of capital.
Congratulations to Mr. Fatino for his work and for getting published.
Link • Murphy decision Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
FISCAL NICOTINE ADDICTION
February 20, 2007
Governor Culver's biggest fiscal initiative is a $1 per pack cigarette tax to fund a health-insurance program. Don't Mess With Taxes points out a danger of nicotine-based public finance:
This year, according to an Associated Press story, New York, Massachusetts and Illinois are all forecasting a drop in cigarette tax revenue. I wouldn't be surprised to see that trend here in Texas, too.
The reason for the decrease? Higher cigarette taxes. In the Lone Star State, the per-pack levy went up a full dollar on Jan. 1.
But rather than bringing in more money because the tax is higher, it seems that the taxes are finally prompting some smokers to kick the nicotine habit. More nonsmokers means less cigarette tax money.
Supporters of the tax find themselves making contradictory arguments: it is good for public health because people will quit smoking; it is also sound policy to enter into long term spending committments with tobacco money because people will keep smoking. The likely result is a long-term fiscal fiasco.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
MUDDY CARNIVAL
February 20, 2007
The snow is melting, the cars are all dirty, so celebrate your grimy car with this week's blog carnivals.
The Carnival of the Capitalists is "preparing to go back to its quality roots." You can see what this means at SimplifyThis.
The Carnival of Taxes is back home at Don't Mess With Taxes. You can read Dan Meyer's (TickMarks) contribution on Tax Deduction Wallflowers.
The Carnival of Personal Finance is at Stock Market Beat this week.
Link • Comments (2) Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
LOOKS LIKE THINGS WILL BE GETTING LIVELY AT BT
February 20, 2007
The actual story can only spoil this headline in the UK newspapaper The Independent:
Accountant Rake succeeds Bland as BT chairman
We've known a few accountant rakes in our day, but they managed to be bland at the same time.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
BECAUSE TOM ARNOLD NEEDS A SUBSIDY
February 19, 2007
The Des Moines Register reports that the bill to subsidize Iowa filmmakers and their vendors with tax credits has been introduced (SF 183) in the Iowa Senate. The bill, as expected, provides tax credits that filmmakers can sell, so the state ends up providing a direct cash subsidy to Iowa film projects. From the Des Moines Register piece:
The effort in the Legislature to make Iowa more competitive is receiving encouragement from actor Tom Arnold, an Ottumwa native. He has conferred with leading House and Senate sponsors of the bills.
Arnold would like to do some of his acting work in Iowa, said Rep. Mark Davitt, an Indianola Democrat. "He'd like the same thing for young people in Iowa, so they can do their creative work here"
Oh, come on. It's for the "young people"? That's what Harold Hill said, too, but he didn't have 27 co-sponsors.
Prior coverage:
HAROLD HILL WANTS US TO FINANCE HIS FILM
HAROLD HILL WANTS TO MAKE A MOVIE IN IOWA
Link • Eye on the Legislature: 2007 • Comments (2) Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
STAN VER PLOEG, 1924-2007
February 19, 2007
We lost a good friend last week. Stanley Ver Ploeg died in an auto accident in Knoxville, Tennessee.
Stan and his long time business partner, Bob Savage, were Roth & Company's first landlords in 1990, when we were just five guys with card tables and telephones.
Stan and Bob founded Savage - Ver Ploeg and Associates (now SVPA Architects, Inc.), one of Iowa's premier architecture firms. He leaves behind a legacy of elegant modern design.
Our thoughts and prayers are with Virginia and the rest of Stan's family.
Link: Des Moines Register obituary.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
HOUSE PASSES THEIR MINIMUM WAGE TAX RIDERS
February 19, 2007
The House of Representatives has passed its minimum wage bill with a set of tax provisions that differs from that passed by the Senate. The differences have to be worked out in conference.
The tax provisions are designed to compensate businesses for the higher minimum wage. The Tax Policy Blog says the tax provisions show that two wrongs don't make a right:
As we said in an earlier blog post, if Congress wants to compensate those harmed by minimum wage laws, they would be better off giving every American a $20 gift certificate to his/her favorite restaurant rather than trying to pass certain tax provisions targeted to various types of company behavior.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
DEVELOPING THE ECONOMY BY GIVING MONEY AWAY
February 17, 2007
There are several bills in the hopper in the Iowa legislature to increase the allowable tax credits for rehabbing old buildings. One has an interesting twist: it would give money away for buildings that have already been rehabbed. HF 360, introduced by the "Committee on Economic Growth," increases the value of historic rehab credits that have already been issued but haven't been used.
Iowa's rehabilitation credit allows taxpayers to eliminate their Iowa tax tax with their credits dollar-for-dollar. If the credits exceed their tax, the state gives an actual cash subsidy of up to 75 cents for each dollar of credit, using a discounting formula. Taxpayers get a certificate showing the amount of credit they are entitled to.
HF 360 eliminates the discount for tax credits issued before 2007. This means people who have already been awarded credits will get a free windfall from the state for work that they've already done or committed to.
I think credits like this are at best questionable, but there's at least a logical argument for giving taxpayers a subsidy to rehab old buildings that haven't yet been fixed up. These credits, though, are for work that's already done, or that people have agreed to do for the credits that were already available. No business would pay a contractor that way, but that's economic growth, Iowa-syle.
Follow the progress of this bill and all other 2007 Iowa session tax legislation at our 2007 Iowa Tax Legislation page.
Link • Eye on the Legislature: 2007 Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
IT'S NOT ALWAYS A TAX PROBLEM
February 17, 2007
We've noted the tendency of lawmakers to consider the tax law a sort of Leatherman Tool of public policy - it can do anything! Unfortunately, the more things the tax law does, the worse it is at its essential function: raising the revenue needed to support essential functions of government.
The TaxProf notes an important study of one aspect of this problem, Implementing Disaster Relief Through Tax Expenditures: An Assessment of the Katrina Emergency Tax Relief Measures, 81 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 2158 (2006). From the abstract:
Unprecedented before 2001, tax relief targeted to a disaster in a specific geographic region has now been established on two occasions--in the wake of the 9/11 attacks and in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. This Note argues that, in a disaster, both the vulnerability of lower-income taxpayers and the weaknesses of the Internal Revenue Code as an instrument for social programs are amplified.
Tax policies implemented in response to a disaster will be far too slow to help in the immediate recovery and are impossible to design precisely to help where its most needed. Once in place, they are hard to remove. But bad idea or not, the tendency towards spastic policymaking in the wake of disaster gives us reason to expect more tax responses after whatever disaster comes next.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
AND HOW DOES ARTIFICIAL ENDOWMENT COME INTO PLAY?
February 17, 2007
Does the placement of these stories on the TaxProf Blog, captured in this screen shot, suggest that they are related?
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
MARCH 2007 APPLICABLE FEDERAL RATES (AFR) ISSUED
February 17, 2007
The IRS has issued (Rev. Rul. 2007-15) the minimum interest rates for loans made in March 2007:
-Short Term (demand loans and loans with terms of up to 3 years): 5.06%
-Mid-Term (loans from 3-9 years): 4.86%
-Long-Term (over 9 years): 5.01%
Historical AFRs are available at the "links" page at www.rothcpa.com.
Link • Applicable Federal Rates Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
WHY ACCOUNTANTS ARE BETTER THAN TED KENNEDY
February 16, 2007
From the AICPA News Update:
AICPA Hero Jumps into Durham Swamp to Save Car Crash Victim from Drowning
Marcella Wyler, an AICPA finance staffer, risked her life by jumping into a freezing Durham swamp to save a woman whose car was upside down in several feet of water after an accident. Wyler and two other rescuers jumped into the water and pulled the woman to safety. This incident occurred less than a mile from the AICPA office in Durham, NC. Our hats go off to Marcy and the other rescuers for their courage, selflessness and quick response to a tragic situation. To find out more, visit ABC News site.
Mary Jo Kopechne could not be reached for comment.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
ATTENTION, EASTERN IOWA ENTREPRENEURS!
February 16, 2007
Check out the featured property today at the IRS Auction Page:
602 Lombard Street, Clarence, IA 52216 - Outside, in front of building. Property consists of a 2392 sq. ft., three-story brick building on a 26 foot by 92 foot lot. Building was constructed in 1900; main floor of the property is currently operated as a bar & grill, upper floors contain 3 apartments.
A great opportunity on the booming low-tech Highway 30 corridor between Mechanicsville and Clinton. The auction is February 22, so act now!
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
WALL STREET JOURNAL HAS TAX SEASON BLOG
February 16, 2007
The Wall Street Journal has started a tax blog to run through the tax season. The Tax Blog should be available whether or not you are an online WSJ subscriber. It joines a blog family that includes the Law Blog and Washington Wire.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
CENTER-LEFT THINK TANK LOOKS AT BUSH HEALTH PROPOSALS
February 16, 2007
The center-left Tax Policy Center has a surprisingly favorable report on the Bush health care standard deduction proposal. From the report's introduction:
The president's plan effectively turns the existing tax subsidy for health insurance into a kind of voucher. It would increase the amount of tax relief that subsidizes acquisition of some health insurance while eliminating the tax advantages at the margin for increased consumption of health care over all other goods. The proposal will almost certainly encourage some people who currently lack insurance, particularly middle-income families, to get it. And the core of the new proposal is not biased towards the provision of favored forms of insurance (e.g., high deductible policies) over other forms of insurance that could reduce spending (e.g., managed care or plans with higher copayments).
However, as under current law, the subsidy will be more valuable for high-income people than for those with lower incomes who most need help. In fact, low-income households with no income tax liability would get very little help, as is true under the current structure. These limitations could easily be addressed by converting the proposed standard deduction into a flat credit or even a sliding-scale credit that is larger for low-income families.
The report also questions whether the proposal adequately encourages the development of markets in individual health insurance. Considering the source, this is praising the plan with faint damns.
Prior coverage:
IN THIS CORNER, THE VILLANOVA MAULER
TRY ON THE PRESIDENT'S HEALTH PLAN
STATE OF THE UNION HEALTH CARE PROPOSAL
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
NEW GUIDANCE SETS MARCH 15 DEADLINE FOR ROLLOVERS OF 2006 FLEX PLAN BALANCES TO HSAs
February 16, 2007
The tax act passed at the end of the last Congress allows taxpayers to roll some heath care flex-plan balances into Health Savings Accounts. The IRS yesterday issued rules (Notice 2007-22) for these rollovers. For rollovers from amounts in flex-plans at the end of 2006, the balances can go into HSAs if the employer amends the flex plan to allow the rollovers by March 15, 2007.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
BARRINGTON BARRISTER BANISHED
February 16, 2007
The party's over for Barrington, Illinois attorney Robert Wayne Hallock. He had a good time with the proceeds of a $1.8 million fraudulent financial instrument, including a $100,000 honeymoon on a yacht.
The party wound down yesterday when Mr. Hallock was sentenced to 24 months in prison.
Perhaps he'll skip through the prison gates humming the lyrics to one of the great pop tunes of the legal profession:
I admire, my attorney Bernie I admire, any guy who knows his stuff Sure we blew a couple ventures with a counterfeit debenture But you win a few, you lose a few and like Bernie says you keep on hanging toughThanks to you, my attorney Bernie Thanks to you, I'm considered well-to-do Sure I made out like a bandit Just exactly like you planned it But like Murray my accountant told me yesterday, I owe it all to you.
Link: Prior Tax Update Coverage.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, OR DE SOTO'S REVENGE?
February 15, 2007
Grow the Iowa economy by subsidizing Spain?
That seems to be the plan. Between forgivable loans and tax credits, Acciona Energy of North America is lining up for over $5 million in aid to build a wind turbine factory. State 29 does the math:
Iowa taxpayers will be spending almost $47,000 for each of the 110 jobs that pay an average of $31,500 a year if Acciona get all the taxpayer-financed corporate welfare they seek.
De Soto would have had an easier time if he had tax credits and forgivable loans.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
IT'S OUR DESTINY: IOWA NEAR TOP IN INCOME, SALES TAX RATES
February 15, 2007
The Tax Policy Blog has a post linking a number of state-by-state tax comparision charts. You can go here for the corporation income tax rates, individual income tax rates, sales tax rates, and property tax and tax burden comparisions.
Iowa has the highest corporate rate in the country, at 12%, and the 5th highest individual tax rate, at 8.98%. Sure, we we get lots of special interest breaks and federal deductibility, but that just means we have a lot of complexity to go with our high rates.
The highest sales tax rate among the states is 7%, in Mississippi, Tennessee, Rhode Island and New Jersey. Central Iowans will vote on whether to join this elite group in the "Project Destiny" referendum this spring. With all Iowa counties now having a local option sales tax, we have a 6% statewide sales tax rate. The 1-cent Project Destiny tax will put central Iowa in the same 7% league as Tupelo and Newark for economic and cultural dynamism.
Link • Iowa Tax Law Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
KPMG CRISIS RECALLED IN WALL STREET JOURNAL
February 15, 2007
The Wall Street Journal has a page-1 piece today on accounting giant KPMG's near-death experience. It tells how Timothy Flynn took the reins of the firm when the former chairman stepped down after being diagnosed with a fatal brain tumor. Only three days later, Mr. Flynn was in conference with the Justice Department trying to keep the firm from being indicted for its tax-shelter dealings.
It's an interesting account of how KPMG narrowly avoided being put out of business by its tax shelter products. It certainly is a different firm than it was in 2005.
Link • KPMG ~ • Tax Shelter News • Comments (2) Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
SO WHAT DO THE BEARS AND COUGARS WEAR NOW?
February 14, 2007
Explanation to SSB 1220, proposed by the chairman of the Iowa Senate Natural Resources Committee:
This bill adds black bears and cougars to the list of fur-bearing animals.
They'll be happy to give up the polyester, no doubt.
Actually, the bill is much worse than just silly:
Currently black bears and cougars are not addressed in the Code and as such are unprotected nongame animals. As fur-bearing animals, black bears and cougars may be taken legally only during an open hunting season established by the natural resource commission.
Just what we need. It's not enough to have deer killing people; now we'll throw real predators into the mix, under the protection of the state. We'll all be jittery going outside if they control wildcat numbers as well as they've controlled deer numbers. Maybe there will be a new DNR policy: "When you shoot them, they're our cougars; when they eat you, they're your cougars."
Link • Eye on the Legislature: 2007 Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
IOWA CORPORATION COMBINED REPORTING BILL INTRODUCED
February 14, 2007
The bill to impose combined reporting of income of "unitary" corporations filing consolidated returns (HF 326) has been introduced in the Iowa House. It's a key part of the Governor's budget and seems certain to pass. From the bill explanation:
This bill requires that the net income of affiliated groups of corporations engaged in a unitary usiness be computed on a combined return basis for corporate tax purposes if the group meets the requirements for filing a consolidated return for federal tax purposes. The affiliated group would include corporations with common ownership whereby one or more corporation sown 80 percent or more of another corporation. The bill would require that one Iowa corporate income tax return be filed that would include all unitary members of an affiliated group. Any nonunitary member that is subject to Iowa tax would file its own separate corporate return. Only Iowa sales of those corporations doing business in Iowa would be included in the numerator of the Iowa sales ratio. The bill also provides that only those corporations doing business in Iowa are jointly and severally liable for the tax of the combined return.
The bill applies retroactively to January 1, 2007, for tax years beginning on or after that date.
Because the bill is retroactive, it will affect estimated tax payments this year for many coporations.
Track all Iowa 2007 tax legislation at our 2007 Iowa Tax Legislation page.
Link • Eye on the Legislature: 2007 ~ • Iowa Tax Law Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
STRANGEST ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE A SENTENCING JUDGE?
February 14, 2007
I don't know if showing a little leg to a judge has ever worked in getting a sentence reduced, but I'm pretty sure it's never worked for a 64 year-old, 366 lb. defendant:
A picture may be worth a thousand words, but a whole stack of them did not suit this self-styled seer to the stars.
"Can I show you my legs?" Caryville psychic David Marius Guardino, 64, asked Senior U.S. District Judge James H. Jarvis Tuesday.
In fairness, it appears he wasn't trying to addle the judge with his good looks:
"Come on up here," Jarvis responded, setting the stage for a surreal courtroom encounter in which Jarvis stood up from the bench and peered over it to watch as Guardino hoisted his pant legs to convince the judge he deserves judicial mercy because of health woes.
Sexy or sad, Mr. Guardino's legs didn't impress the judge:
Guardino was facing Jarvis on Tuesday to be sentenced for failing to pay taxes on $1 million he's earned from his soothsaying. With an earlier federal conviction for bilking customers, Guardino's bid for mercy was in trouble from the start.
It also didn't help that Jarvis considered most of Guardino's health woes to be the result of his obesity. Guardino has weighed in at nearly 500 pounds, though he told Jarvis he's dropped down to 366.
"What came first - the overweight (condition) or the leg problem?" Jarvis asked at one point...
...[Defense Attorney] Moffatt asked for probation. Jarvis refused and instead hit Guardino with a 21-month prison term, a figure on the high end of the penalty range the psychic faced.
Yes, the gift of clairvoyance is indeed overrated.
UPDATE: I should hope it's not overrated; I seem to have the gift myself.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
VALENTINES DAY CARNIVALS
February 14, 2007
It's a great day to cozy up to a computer screen with someone special to read this week's blog carnivals.
The Cavalcade of Risk is at My Wealth Builder this week. A fascinating post at Insureblog tells the strange tale of parents too cheap to spend $450 to protect their daughters from a slow and painful premature death. People have interesting priorities.
The Carnival of the Capitalists is at TamsPalm - the Palm OS Blog. The new Carnival of Personal Finance is at 2million blog.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
LOWER SUBSIDY = LOWER PRICES? AMAZING!
February 14, 2007
Don't Mess With Taxes brings us a shocking story: the elimination of the tax credit for Toyota hybrid cars has reduced demand for the Prius. As a result, prices are coming down!
This could lead to a radical new approach to pricing hybrid cars: setting the price at what people will pay for them. It's a bitter pill, but desperate times are leading Toyota to desperate measures.
Sellers of other subsidized products should watch this development closely. While it seems inconceivable now, in theory people will get tired of paying $2 or $3 out of every gas fill to keep excess ethanol plants running. As a dire contingency plan, they may have to resort to finding a way charge people for ethanol the amount they would pay for, say, gasoline.
This theory could also apply to the higher education industry. It appears to the untrained eye that every initiative to make college "more affordable" was immediately absorbed by higher tuition prices. Maybe someday we'll find out if the ultimate way to make college more affordable is to eliminate the rat's nest of tax credits, deductions and tuition subsidies for the college industry.
As a last resort, of course.
Link • Comments (1) Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
TURBO TAX MOJO? ISN'T THAT LIKE 'AN ACCOUNTANT'S SWAGGER'?
February 13, 2007
I guess Vanilla Ice isn't entirely dead yet (via the TaxProf):
Vanilla Ice will always have his own dusty corner in the my early 1990s memory attic, right next to the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
GOOD MORNING!
February 13, 2007
Just another February commute on I-235 in Des Moines this morning. This was taken at very low speed near the MLK exit.
Link • Comments (2) Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
WHEN A TAX CHEAT IS TOO SUCCESSFUL FOR HIS OWN GOOD
February 13, 2007
George Schussel did well running DCI. The company ran "computer based training seminars, trade shows, and conferences for businesses in the computer industry."
Mr. Schussel enhanced the after-tax performance of his business by hiding his cash in Bermuda. Unfortunately, this is illegal, but he seemed to be getting by with it.
For every entrepreneur, the day comes when it's time to cash out. That's when things went south. From the Department of Justice press release:
The diversion of DCI profits to Bermuda ended in 1995, when SCHUSSEL wanted to sell the company and realized that he could not disclose the true value of the company and its ability to generate substantial income, without potential discovery of the tax evasion scheme.
Unfortunately, the IRS came calling. The agent found that DCI was writing checks to a Bermuda shell company that were purportedly for deductible services, but were really just a way to hide income offshore. Mr. Schussel eventually was convicted of one count of conspiracy and two counts of tax evasion.
The press release says that DCI underreported income by $8 million. Federal sentencing guidelines say this should result in a sentence range starting at 51-63 months in prison, assuming a $2.5 million tax loss. Not good for a 65-year old.
The Moral: Once you start cheating, it can be hard to stop.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
WHAT DO YOU NEED WHEN THE IRS HEADQUARTERS BASEMENT FLOODS?
February 12, 2007
More water! At least that seems to be the implication of this TaxProf Blog headline:
TIGTA Report: Flood of IRS Building Did Not Impact Tax Administration
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
HOUSE MINIMUM WAGE BILL OMITS SENATE S CORPORATION PROVISIONS
February 12, 2007
The House Ways and Means Committee has issued its own tax provisions to accompany the bill to increase the minimum wage increase. The Ways and Means bill has none of the S corporation provisions in the Senate bill. It instead raises the Section 179 deduction to $125,000 for 2007 (instead of $112,000) while extending the work opportunity tax credit an additional year. It also allows married couples to file jointly owned businesses as a sole proprietorship, rather than a partnership.
The house bill also has a tax increase for dependent children, denying them the use of the lowest capital gain bracket (currently 5%) and increases the amount of estimated tax payments for large corporations for the first three quarters of 2012.
Once it clears the full House, the tax provisions will have to be reconciled with the more ambitious Senate version.
The TaxProf and Don't Mess with Taxes have more coverage.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
BIG COMPANIES CHIP IN FOR HIGHER TAXES
February 12, 2007
The Des Moines Register reports that a handful of big companies are financing the push to raise the local sales tax to 7%:
The companies, which include Wells Fargo, Allied Insurance and Knapp Properties, contributed $307,500 of the $315,000 raised for the "Yes to Destiny" campaign, a recently filed state report shows.
The campaign is primarily the work of the Greater Des Moines Partnership, a business development group that says the 1 cent sales tax would generate an estimated $750 million over 10 years to help lower property taxes and finance cultural efforts
Surely at least Iowa's tax watchdog, Iowans for Tax Relief, will stand up against this, right? Well, not exactly:
Jeff Boeyink, president of Iowans for Tax Relief, said his group would generally support the proposal if it is approved by taxpayers.
"People have every right if they want to tax themselves," Boeyink said. "We're not going to be arrogant enough to suggest we know what's right or wrong for any community."
Once again demonstrating that ITR functions more as a special interest lobby than as a principled force for tax relief.
Meanwhile, another story in the Register shows that the tax increase campaign is operating with the thriftiness we've come to expect from local government here:
Of the $245,819 spent on the "Yes to Destiny" campaign so far, at least $118,000 has gone to campaign consultants.
Former Polk County Supervisor Richard "Red" Brannan, for example, has been paid more than $6,200. He did not return repeated telephone calls that sought comment about his work for the tax campaign.
Jeff Link's company, Link Strategies, has been paid more than $38,000. Link is a former chief of staff for U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin and works on former Gov. Tom Vilsack's presidential campaign. Link was paid $36,000 in November for his role in Polk County Supervisor John Mauro's re-election.
The only organized opposition to the tax increase so far seems to be at nonewsalestax.blogspot.com. With a little help from the U.S. Attorney, that may be enough.
Link Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
IT'S NOT JUST HERE...
February 10, 2007
...that the local chamber of commerce perversely supports higher taxes, corporate welfare and big-government initiatives. Apparently crony capitalism is fashionable with chambers of commerce nationwide. From an opinion piece by Stephen Moore in the Wall Street Journal:
In as many as half the states, state taxpayer organizations, free market think tanks and small business leaders now complain bitterly that, on a wide range of issues, chambers of commerce deploy their financial resources and lobbying clout to expand the taxing, spending and regulatory authorities of government. This behavior, they note, erodes the very pro-growth climate necessary for businesses -- at least those not connected at the hip with government -- to prosper. Journalist Tim Carney agrees: All too often, he notes in his recent book, "Rip-Off," "state and local chambers have become corrupted by the lure of big dollar corporate welfare schemes."
It's a strange and disturbing phenomenon.
(Via the TaxProf)
Link • Comments (1) Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
IRS APPLIES DEFERRED COMP RULES FOR 2006 BACKDATED OPTIONS
February 09, 2007
The IRS yesterday set down a plan dealing with small fry in the options backdating scandal. The program "allows" companies to pay the 20% penalty tax for backdated options exercised in 2006 by employees who are not "insiders" for SEC disclosure purposes. The employees have to include the company payment in income.
The 20% penalty tax under the recently-enacted Section 409A applies to non-compliant deferred compensation plans. In this announcement the IRS lays down a marker: it says that 409A applies to backdated options.
There doesn't appear to be much of a concession here on the part of the IRS. It seems that the company always has the option to pay the employee's Section 409A penalty, as long as the payment is included in employee income. Tax Analysts reports ($link) that tax advisors for holders of backdated options aren't happy:
The IRS program departs significantly from the practitioners' recommendations and was quickly criticized. The group had suggested that employers be allowed to make a payment equal to 20 percent of the option discount at the time it was granted to remedy any backdated options, whether or not exercised. Instead, the IRS would force employers to make the 20 percent payment, plus interest, and then count the payments on behalf of their employees as compensation.
One practitioner, who asked to remain anonymous to protect IRS relationships, said the initiative offers no carrots for either companies or taxpayers. Companies are not currently liable for the tax and would be acting only to save thousands of potential taxpayers from having to fix the problem individually -- thus saving the IRS from the trouble of pursuing thousands of cases.
"I will not recommend that any of my clients take this offer," the practitioner said.
Unfortunately for this practitioner's clients, the IRS already has them over a barrel. The only thing that can keep the IRS from catching up with them not assigning enough agents assigned to the option backdating project. If I were an employee, I'd rather have my employer pay my 20% penalty, even if it increases my taxes, if I would otherwise have to pay the whole penalty myself. If I were the employer, though, I'd have another view entirely.
Link: Complete Tax Update backdated option coverage.
Link • Backdated Options Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
ON-LINE GAMBLERS: IT MAY BE TIME TO REDO THOSE RETURNS
February 09, 2007
Taxable Talk tells the tale of Neteller, an company that served as an intermediary for U.S. customers and on-line gambling outfits.
Neteller's founders were arrested on money laundering and other charges last month, and now the company is cooperating with the Justice Department. Russ explains why this could be bad news for online gamblers:
First, Neteller is considered to be a foreign financial institution. If you have a foreign bank account, and have $10,000 or more in a foreign bank account(s) at any one time, you are required to file Form TD F 90-22.1 by June 30th of the following year with the Department of the Treasury and check the box at the bottom of Schedule B. If you have a foreign bank account and don't declare it, you can face civil and/or criminal penalties. Anyone who received $10,000 or more in one transaction from Neteller had a foreign bank account. I expect the Treasury Department to check their records and come after those who didn't declare their Neteller account. A few individuals may even face criminal prosecution over this, if they had extremely large transactions from Neteller.
Second, the IRS will check their records and see if individuals receiving funds from Neteller declared gambling winnings. The IRS will almost certainly target those receiving large amounts. If an individual received large amounts from Neteller, and didn't declare any gambling winnings, now is the time to amend your return, and pay the tax, interest, and penalties. It's almost always better to come forward to the IRS than to have the IRS knock on your door.
The worst thing about gambling income is that it is reported "above the line" separately from gambling losses, which a