« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
Jack Townsend explains the IRS bait and switch in its 2009 foreign account "amnesty":
...the Taxpayer Advocate criticizes the IRS's implementation of its statement in the 2009 OVDP that “[U]nder no circumstances will a taxpayer be required to pay a penalty greater than what he would otherwise be liable for under existing statutes.” The IRS did the old bait and switch on that seemingly clear statement.
He quotes the Taxpayer Advocate's report:
On March 1, 2011, more than a year after the 2009 OVDP ended, the IRS “clarified” its seemingly unambiguous statement.139 It would no longer consider whether taxpayers in the 2009 OVDP would pay less under existing statutes on the basis of non-willfulness or reasonable cause. Such taxpayers could either agree to pay more than they believed they owed or withdraw from the 2009 OVDP and face the possibility the IRS would assert massive civil penalties and seek criminal prosecution.
So remember, IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman is all about fairness.
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rothcpa.com/mt/contages.cgi/2993
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
Comments
Sneaky. Then again the IRS always is.
Posted by: tax accountant nj | July 1, 2011 4:18 PM