« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
I'd think twice about getting tax advice from somebody whose web site looked like this:

Yet people still came to Carel Prater to buy quack advice about using the "Section 861 argument" that U.S.-source income is nontaxable. The injunction pictured above said Mr. Prater wasn't supposed to do that, and this week Mr. Prater was convicted of "corrupt interference with the Internal Revenue Laws, aiding and assisting the filing of a false tax return, failure to file a tax return, criminal contempt, structuring transactions to avoid reporting requirements, and making false declarations before a grand jury."
The "Section 861" argument is the same one used by Wesley Snipes, leading to his failure-to-file conviction that he is currently appealing.
Prior Tax Update Coverage: YOU KNOW YOU'VE HAD A BAD DAY (II)...
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rothcpa.com/mt/contages.cgi/1664
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to