« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
Supporters of hugely-subsidized rail passenger service in Iowa were disappointed when their dreams of Soviet Amtrak service to Iowa City and Des Moines were reduced to four remote controlled crossovers in southern Iowa.
But when it comes to getting federal money for obsolete technology, the dream never dies:
But train supporters, including Gov. Chet Culver, said they won't give up their efforts to upgrade passenger rail service in Iowa."With the work we have already done, we will be competitive for future rounds of funding," Culver said.
As we have pointed out, advocates for expanded passenger rail rely on passenger demand projections that make the original forecasts for wildly profitable harness racing in Iowa look realistic. For example, the Iowa City route is "projected" to have 187,000 riders annually. Ridership of 187,000 assumes that everyone in Iowa City takes the trip three times a year, or that everybody in Iowa City and Cedar Rapids, the two towns in the area, rides once a year. It assumes over 500 riders a day, 365 days a year, between Iowa City and Chicago. That's a pipe dream. The two routes serving Iowa now had Iowa boardings at six stations totaling 64,260 in 2008.
Not only does the obsession with the delusion of efficient rail service waste your money, it actually damages more practical forms of mass transit. For example, transportation planners in Des Moines want to move the current bus lines, which now discharge in the middle of the business district next to the skywalk, to a new terminal down by the railroad tracks, to accommodate trains that will never come. This would force the thousands who actually use existing mass transit to walk through the rain, snow and ice three blocks for the convenience of the imaginary train riders.
Approximate location of proposed downtown Des Moines bus-rail hub.
Still, the central planners are undaunted:
Tom Kane, executive director of the Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization, said the federal grant decisions were a setback for Des Moines. That's because passenger train service can't be restored to Des Moines until a train begins operating between Chicago and Iowa City. Metro officials hope once that happens, passenger train service can be extended from Iowa City through Des Moines to Omaha."This decision is a blow to us," Kane said. "We need a transportation system that gives us choices - a combination of air, road and rail. This is a disappointment, but it will not diminish our interest."
Des Moines hasn't had regularly scheduled passenger train service since May 31, 1970, when the Rock Island Lines' Cornbelt Rocket train ceased operations. The Cornbelt Rocket ran between Council Bluffs and Chicago.
So we "need" something we've done without for 40 years. Maybe Grandpa was right 40 years ago when he figured out that people wouldn't pay enough to ride trains to come close to covering the costs of running them. Yet those who like to indulge nostalgia with your grandchildrens' tax money won't let that stand in their way.
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rothcpa.com/mt/contages.cgi/1514
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
Comments
I am sure that you have thought of this, but your numbers assume no riders from Chicago. I believe that a large portion of the expected ridership is to come from college students and alumni who live in the Chicagoland area, which is a substantial number at the UI, and from college students who want to travel to Chicago for the weekend. City populations only account for college students in small percentages, as many are nonresidents of Iowa City/Coralville/North Liberty or even Iowa, for that matter. My goal here is not to endorse the project one way or another but simply to point out that your numbers are a bit short-sighted. Here is a recent Daily Iowan article about the issue: http://www.dailyiowan.com/2010/01/29/Metro/15291.html .
Posted by: Jared Trullinger | January 30, 2010 10:21 AM