« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
Mary O'Keeffe thinks maybe so; Peter Pappas thinks not.
It probably is unwise to compensate for normal audits. They're a cost of doing business. If the IRS audits you twice in a short period with no changes, I would argue otherwise. The strongest case for paying audit victims is when the IRS does a "research program" audit; there the purpose isn't so much to raise revenue as to develop statistics. At least they could give a free dinner at Applebees or something.
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rothcpa.com/mt/contages.cgi/1250
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to