« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
Talking Points Memo says Sarah Palin may have to report taxable income from a charity auction of a dinner date with the former vice-presidential candidate (via the TaxProf). She would then be allowed to deduct the $63,000 proceeds, but would probably be out cash because of the phase-out of itemized deductions at higher income levels. TPM bases its conclusion on Treasury Reg. Sec. 1.61-2(c), which reads:
Payment to charitable, etc., organization on behalf of person rendering services. The value of services is not includible in gross income when such services are rendered directly and gratuitously to an organization described in section 170(c). Where, however, pursuant to an agreement or understanding, services are rendered to a person for the benefit of an organization described in section 170(c) and an amount for such services is paid to such organization by the person to whom the services are rendered, the amount so paid constitutes income to the person performing the services.
TPM is probably wrong. The dinner date is likely covered by Rev. Rul. 68-503, reprinted below, which interprets the regulation in the context of an entertainer who performs at a fund-raiser. The ruling holds that the entertainer is not taxable on the proceeds of a fund-raising performance where the entertainer isn't entitled to any of the proceeds. The IRS would likely apply this ruling to a charitable dinner date. You can draw distinctions between a dinner date auction and a fund-raising performance, but the main difference seems to be the size of the audience, which shouldn't affect the tax results.
Update, 10/22/2009: Sarah Palin, meet Eleanor Roosevelt
Text of Rev. Rul 68-503:
No amount is includible in a performer's gross income as a result of professional services rendered gratuitously in entertainment programs promoted by a political fund-raising organization.Full Text:
At the request of a political fund-raising organization, an individual taxpayer gratuitously rendered professional services as a featured performer in entertainment programs planned, organized, promoted, and scheduled by the fund-raising organization. He was not entitled to, and received no payment for these services. Admissions were charged for the programs, and the net proceeds inured solely to the fund-raising organization.
Held, under these facts, no amount is includible in the individual's gross income as a result of the gratuitous services rendered. In the present case, the fund-raising organization is the promoter of the entertainment programs, and the fact that services are contributed in connection therewith does not, of itself, result in gross income to the contributor. See section 1.61-2(c) of the Income Tax Regulations; G.C.M. 27026, C.B. 1951-2, 7; and Rev. Rul. 66-167, C.B. 1966-1, 20.
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rothcpa.com/mt/contages.cgi/1149
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
Comments
The logic of Revenue Rules 83-127 and 68-123 would also seem to apply to this situation.
Posted by: OT13 | October 21, 2009 9:57 AM