« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
The answer should be "of course not." Unfortunately, a nonresident of Iowa had to actually protest an assessment before Iowa arrived at the right answer:
In this instance, there is no evidence that the stock was used by protester as in integral part of some business activity in the year of the sale. Therefore, the Department erred in apportioning the sale of protester’s ownership interest in Integrity to Iowa. As a result, the review unit will direct the Department’s collection section to cancel the assessment.
Except in very unusual situations, a sale of stock by an individual should always taxed only in the taxpayer's resident state.
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.rothcpa.com/mt/contages.cgi/785
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to