« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
A U.S. district court yesterday applied Iowa's anti-spam law to an Arizona couple that ran a spamming service. And did they ever apply it:
IT IS ORDERED that judgment in the amount of Two Hundred Thirty Six Million Four Hundred Eighty Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Dollars ($236,480,660.00) shall be entered in favor of the plaintiff and against defendants Henry Perez and Suzanne Bartok, jointly and severally, on Kramer’s Iowa Code Chapter 714E claim.
The Iowa law has a $10 per spam penalty. It does not provide for staking spammers on a nest of fire ants, but only because Iowa has no fire ants.
Cite: Kramer v. Perez, USDC-SD Iowa, no. 3:04cv0153
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to