« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
Dr. Maule ponders the recent petition by the government for an en banc review of the Murphy decision. He had pointed out that Murphy fails to properly deal with the statute involved, even without addressing the constitutional issues; yet the petition for hearing brushes past the statutory construction problem. He worries:
Now, in addition to concerns over the chances of the petition being granted and the en banc outcome being decided correctly, there is another worry, namely, that the inability to understand how Internal Revenue Code inclusion and exclusion provisions work will become a problem not just for three judges but for many more. Perhaps this matter can be clarified at oral argument. That, of course, assumes a favorable reaction to the petition. It's tough to imagine the full court letting the three-judge panel's horrific opinion stand without comment.
For Dr. Maule it's a brief post, and as always, well worth reading in full.
• Murphy decision Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to