« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
A judge for the Court of Federal Claims is unimpressed by the word-bending logic of Tax Honesty adherent Robert B. Beale:
Second, plaintiff maintains that he is guaranteed certain unalienable rights by the Constitution of the United States of America, among which are his rights to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness (property)." Id. at 6 (parenthetical original). According to plaintiff, the federal government may not impose a tax or place a lien on these rights, because "unalienable rights are rights against which no lien can be established, precisely because they are un-a-lien-able."
"A-lien-ability" or not, it appears from plaintiff's filings that plaintiff failed to pay income tax in tax years 1992-1995. On March 2, 2005, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") assessed a tax lien of $456,632.67.
How can one resist such a-lien logic? By ruling against Mr. Beale, of course.
Cite: Robert B. Beale v. U.S., Ct. Claims No: 05-1132 T, 11/16/2005
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to