« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
Congress is trying to put together a "tax reconciliation" bill for 2005. This bill is important to Congressional taxwriters because it is the only tax bill that won't need 60 votes to pass the Senate. Considering that so far it can't get 11 votes to pass the Senate Finance Committee, they have their work cut out for them.
The bill has one "must pass" provision - one that would keep AMT from applying to millions more taxpayers in 2006. It also is needed to extend other popular tax breaks, including the research credit and the above-the-line deduction for teacher classroom expenses.
The biggest controversy arises over the desire to use the bill to extend the 15% top capital gain and dividend rate. That reduced rate is set to expire after 2008, at which point it would rise to 20%. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Grassley has been unable to convince Maine Republican Olympia Snowe to go along with extending the reduced rate, and he can't reach 11 votes without her help.
Meanwhile, the House Ways and Means Committee is drafting its own bill. Chairman Bill Thomas wouldn't bother to provide AMT relief. Per Tax Analysts:
Thomas had suggested that exclusion of any AMT relief might work to spur tax reform efforts in 2006, as more families would become ensnared by the tax. The need for a permanent solution to the AMT's growing reach is often regarded as an incentive to reform the tax code, and AMT repeal is the centerpiece of the tax reform plan presented November 1 by the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform.
That's a bit like spurring debate on fire-sprinkler laws by committing arson.
One thing is for sure: estate tax reform is dead for this year, and possibly for this Congress.
Links:
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
Comments
I need to hire you to do my taxes, as boring as they may be. You would have to stifle a yawn, probably more than once. But I love your line, "That's a bit like spurring debate on fire-sprinkler laws by committing arson." Genius!
Posted by: Brent | November 14, 2005 9:18 PM
I'm glad you appreciate the humor! Unfortunately my laugh lines for clients are things like "you forgot to make your estimated payments, and you owe big bucks in taxes and penalties," and they just fall flat for some reason...
Posted by: Joe Kristan | November 15, 2005 6:37 AM