« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
A letter to Tax Analysts today (subscription only; no link available) considers the arithmetic of The New York Times reporter David Cay Johnston's dyspeptic response to a review of his book, Perfectly Legal.
From the letter:
Johnston in his letter criticizes Prof. Pollack for missing the "major news" he broke in his book Perfectly Legal about how truly rich the superrich in the United States have become. He drives home his point with this observation: "The economics of a two-income couple who work all year to earn $300,000 have nothing in common with someone who makes that much every 45 minutes."
There are 8,760 hours in a year, so $400,000 an hour would translate to earnings of $3.5 billion a year. Now, I know that corporate boards continue to disserve their shareholders with ridiculous nine-figure compensation packages for CEOs, but I had not seen anything in the 10-figure range. Perhaps Johnston was basing his figure on a standard 2,000-hour work year, so that a $400,000 hourly rate would extrapolate to annual earnings of $800 million.
The letter goes on to point out that this might only apply to Bill Gates, and even him only one year, when Microsoft took its big dividend.
Mr. Johnston waited a year to respond to the book review. He shouldn't have rushed so.
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
Comments
Actually, the labor supply curve is often thought of as backward-bending. That is, a normal supply curve slopes ever-upward, but a labor supply curve, (owing to time limitations and the like), frequently bends backwards so that at higher wage rates a person actually works less. Given DCJ's background in economics, this explanation is plausible.
Not having read the book or reviewed the economics literature, I don't know if this is where Johnston is coming from. If it is, then it is a poorly phrased sentence and should read: "someone who makes that much in 45 minutes."
Posted by: Brian | March 23, 2005 8:30 AM