« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
Bonnie and Ernest Werts of Carson City had never paid taxes on their Social Security before and nobody said anything; ergo, they should never have to. At least, that's what they told the Tax Court.
Today the Court said otherwise:
Petitioners contend only that respondent never
challenged their omission of such income on prior years'
returns. The mere fact that omission of such income on
petitioners' prior returns was never questioned by respondent
is not a basis for the exclusion of such income on subsequent
returns that are questioned by respondent. Each taxable year
stands alone, and respondent may challenge in a succeeding
year what was condoned or agreed to in a former year.
The moral: two (or more) wrongs don't make a right, under the tax law.
Cite: Werts v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2005-24.
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to