« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
The President has said he won't rule out increasing the amount of salary and self-employment income subject to self-employment tax. This almost guarantees that any Social Security reforms will include a singificant increase in the FICA base (currently $90,000).
Whether this will be enough to move Congress from converting social security from an entirely unfunded transfer payment system to something resembling a funded retirement plan remains unclear.
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to
Comments
IIRC, this cap was set in 1984. I'm not necessarily uncomfortable raising it every 20 years.
I still don't see how this would significantly impact the long term problems with SS, tho.
Posted by: H Stern | February 17, 2005 1:36 PM
Well, it has been indexed.
Posted by: Joe Kristan | February 17, 2005 1:46 PM
> indexed
Which is, I suppose, good. I guess I'm saying that raising the cap:
1) doesn't seem particularly egregious
and
2) doesn't seem to be any kind of serious solution (on its own) to the long term problems facing SS
Or am I missing something?
Posted by: H Stern | February 17, 2005 2:54 PM
Because high rates are economically inefficient. I'd prefer that they get rid of the cap altogether and set the rate at a revenue neutral percentage (probably around 5% instead of 12.5%). The should also means test (based on wealth and income) receipt of benefits so Bill Gates and Warren Buffet don't get a monthly SS check when they turn 65. Once it becomes a true welfare program it will lose a lot of its popular support and real reforms are easier to implement as you ratchet down the participation to less than a majority of voters.
Posted by: Chad | February 17, 2005 4:28 PM