« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
President Bush discussed tax policy for his second term in yesterday's press conference. Let's go to the transcript:
Q Mr. President, as you look at your second term domestic priorities, I wonder if you could talk a little bit about how you see the sequence of action on issues beyond Social Security -- tax reform, education. And if you could expand a little bit for us on the principles that you want to underpin your tax reform proposal -- do you want it to be revenue neutral? What kinds of things do you want to accomplish through that process?
THE PRESIDENT: I appreciate that. I was anticipating this question; that, what is the first thing you're going to do? When it comes it legislation, it just doesn't work that way, particularly when you've laid out a comprehensive agenda. And part of that comprehensive agenda is tax simplification.
The -- first of all, a principle would be revenue neutral. If I'm going to -- if there was a need to raise taxes, I'd say, let's have a tax bill that raises taxes, as opposed to let's simply the tax code and sneak a tax increase on the people. It's just not my style. I don't believe we need to raise taxes. I've said that to the American people. And so the simplification would be the goal.
Now, secondly, that obviously, that it rewards risk and doesn't -- it doesn't have unnecessary penalties in it. But the main thing is that it would be viewed as fair, that it would be a fair system, that it wouldn't be complicated, that there's a -- kind of that loopholes wouldn't be there for special interests, that the code itself be viewed and deemed as a very fair way to encourage people to invest and save and achieve certain fiscal objectives in our country, as well.
One of the interesting debates will be, of course, in the course of simplification, will there be incentives in the code: charitable giving, of course, and mortgage deductions are very important. As governor of Texas, when I -- some time I think I was asked about simplification, I always noted how important it was for certain incentives to be built into the tax code, and that will be an interesting part of the debate.
(Emphasis added)
Now, it's dangerous to read a Presidential press conference transcript like a 1970s issue of Pravda, looking for clues to policy changes. Still, the President said he was anticipating the tax question, so we can assume that his answer provides clues to administration tax policy thinking.
The last paragraph above is very intriguing. The President didn't say "we will preserve the charitable and home mortgage interest deductions." He said that the deductions are "important" and will be "an interesting part of the debate." Yet he also said in the same sentence that "there will be incentives in the code."
We read this as supporting our thoughts yesterday of a system looking more like the AMT - which allows charitable and mortgage interest decuctions, but few others.
We also read the verbiage about "encouraging people to invest and save" as telegraphing a revival of the Lifetime Savings Account and related Retirement Savings Account proposals.
Still, by saying the deductions for charity and home mortgage interest will be "part of the debate," the President leaves them on the table - he hasn't ruled out a more radical tax proposal that makes these deductions go away, such as a sales tax or more radical flat tax. Is that just a gesture to some of his more ant-income tax supporters, or a real openness to radical reform? We suspect just a gesture, but we can't be sure.
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to