« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
We may not have seen the last court decision on Iowa's casino tax.
Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller yesterday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether the Iowa Supreme Court misbehaved in its most recent ruling striking down the tax. The casinos sued to overturn the tax because it taxes land-based casinos at a higher rate than riverboats.
The U.S. Supreme Court had ruled that the Iowa court had misapplied federal "equal protection" law in striking down the tax, so it was not unconstitutional under U.S. constitution standards - standards with the Iowa court said it was trying to apply. The U.S. Court sent the case back to Iowa for proceedings "not inconsistent" with its ruling.
The Iowa Court then struck down the case anyway.
Attorney General Miller's new appeal says that the Iowa court failed to arrive at a ruling "not inconsistent" with the U.S. Court ruling.
Tom Flynn, an attorney for the casinos, quipped: "This has been a most interesting case, but it was my hope that it would be concluded in my lifetime. Now I am not so certain that it will."
Prior coverage:
TAKE THAT, U.S. SUPREME COURT: IOWA SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN CASINO TAX
WHAT IS IOWA'S TAX LAW? WHO KNOWS?
IF RACETRACK = RIVERBOAT, DOES BANK = CREDIT UNION?
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not necessarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to