« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
A U.S. District Judge in Nashville got an opportunity most of us only dream of. A taxpayer who lost a tax case filed suit asking the judge to declare himself immune from federal taxes.
The plaintiff apparently reasoned that he lost his income tax case not because it was deficient in any way, but because the judge was afraid of the IRS.
The judge passed on this opportunity:
Plaintiff asserts in his Motion that federal judges are taxed in the same manner as other taxpayers and are subject to income tax prosecution. In order to alleviate this perceived pressure and undue influence, Plaintiff moves to have the undersigned be immune from federal prosecution for income tax violations for the next ten years. Plaintiff provides no facts or law to support his allegation that federal judges in general, or the undersigned in particular, are under undue pressure because they have to pay income tax on their income and are subject to federal prosecution if they do not do so or how a federal judge could declare himself immune from federal prosecution. This theory is bizarre, without foundation or support, and meritless. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion is hereby DENIED
Of course, it's really tax practitioners that should have this kind of immunity, so we could help our clients comply with the law without fear...
Case: Leslie E. White (no link available).
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to