« Previous · Tax Update Blog Home · Next »
As we mentioned last week, the 2003 tax act increases the maximum Section 179 deduction to $100,000 for 2003, 2004 and 2005. The deduction had been $25,000. This deduction allows taxpayers to immediately deduct expenditures on capital items that they would otherwise have to depreciate over several years.
Unfortunately, a trap awaits some taxpayers who would like this deduction. The section 179 deduction is limited to taxable income from a taxpayer's active trade or business. Any wage income qualifies; K-1 income qualifies if the taxpayer "meaningfully" participates in the business management or operations. Income of passive partners does not qualify; nor does income from pensions, dividends, or interest.
EXAMPLE: Endrun, Inc., an S corporation, purchases $100,000 of assets in 2003. The company is owned equally by Fanny Fastgo, who runs the business; and Larry Livingood, who is retired and who only has interest, dividend and pension income and who has nothing to do with the business. If the company takes a $100,000 Section 179 deduction, Fanny gets a $50,000 deduction. Larry gets no deduction at all; the deduction is carried forward and is available only when he incurs some salary or other active income.
THE MORAL?
A pass-through entity (S corporation or partnership) should make sure its owners can actually use a larger Section 179 deduction before claiming it.
Bookmark: del.icio.us • Digg • reddit
The items included in the Tax Update Blog are informational only and are not meant as tax advice. Consult with your tax advisor to determine how any item applies to your situation.
Joe Kristan writes the Tax Update items, and any opinions expressed or implied are not neccesarily shared by anyone else at Roth & Company, P.C. Address questions or comments on Tax Updates to